Home arrow News and Press Releases arrow Cable and Public Access TV News arrow Verizon and SBC Warned on Redlining Thursday, November 20 2008  
Public Access of Indianapolis Home
Our Issues
The Campaign for Public Access TV
Indy Needs Access TV
Telecom Reform '06
Get Involved
Calendar
Sign the Petition
Join Mailing List
Support Our Efforts
Discussion Forum
Our Programs
Video Library
New Citizens Watch
Alternative Media Festival
About Us
News and Press Releases
About Us
Contact Us
Resources
Home
Useful Links
More Web Links
Privacy Policy
Administrator

Bookmark Us
 
 
 
Verizon and SBC Warned on Redlining Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 20 April 2005
Summary: SBC and Verizon do not want to have to provide their new video over IP services to all homes in an area the way cable companies do.  SBC calls it a "sound business decision" while Massachusetts Representative Ed Markey calls it "redlining." 

Verizon, SBC warned on 'redlining'

From Dallas Morning News,

Verizon Communications Inc. and SBC Communications Inc. were warned by a U.S. lawmaker that they may face consequences if they sell new television services only in “affluent” areas.

“It is particularly troubling that SBC and Verizon have deployment plans that skip over or avoid the very communities in their service territories which could most benefit from an affordable alternative in the marketplace,” Massachusetts Representative Ed Markey, the ranking Democrat on the House telecommunications and Internet subcommittee, said today.

Verizon and SBC, the two largest U.S. local-telephone companies, are installing fiber-optic cable to offer TV service to 21 million customers in competition with cable-TV operators such as Comcast Corp. Markey said he’s concerned the companies will be slow to make the service available in low-income areas. He was speaking at a hearing over what government rules should apply to phone carriers intent on bringing video to homes.

“Any sound business decision has to be made based on the needs of the marketplace and the market’s response to these services,” Lea Ann Champion, SBC’s senior executive vice president for Internet-Protocol operations and services, said under questioning about when the company would install fiber to reach the other half of its 36 million households.

Shares of San Antonio-based SBC fell 17 cents to $23.03 as of 2:05 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Shares of New York-based Verizon fell 41 cents to $33.74.

No ‘Redlining’

Markey cited requirements that cable-TV companies serve all households in a franchise area.

“I want your commercial interest and the public interest to rhyme, and today, it has yet to do so, and that is your challenge in the years ahead,” Markey told Champion. “Otherwise, I think you’re not going to have the reception you want from this committee.”

Champion said SBC is open to rules for carrying non- commercial programming, as satellite-TV companies are required to do.

Seidenberg said at a March 2 House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing that the suggestion that Verizon avoids serving less-desirable customers, a practice known as “redlining,” is “offensive to me because that’s not the way we do business. We deploy our technology, we don’t redline.”

The company has said its TV plans are being hampered by the need to get permission from individual cities.

This article is from Dallas Morning News. If you found it informative and valuable, we strongly encourage you to visit their website and register an account to view all their articles on the web. Support quality journalism.


This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
< Prev   Next >
Top of Page P0wer ed by Mam b0 0pen S ource
Copyright @1996-2006 Public Access of Indianapolis