Home arrow News and Press Releases arrow Cable and Public Access TV News arrow Verizon wants piece of TV, cable pie Thursday, August 28 2008  
Public Access of Indianapolis Home
Our Issues
The Campaign for Public Access TV
Indy Needs Access TV
Telecom Reform '06
Get Involved
Calendar
Sign the Petition
Join Mailing List
Support Our Efforts
Discussion Forum
Our Programs
Video Library
New Citizens Watch
Alternative Media Festival
About Us
News and Press Releases
About Us
Contact Us
Resources
Home
Useful Links
More Web Links
Privacy Policy
Administrator

Bookmark Us
 
 
 
Verizon wants piece of TV, cable pie Print E-mail
Written by Andrew Blazier   
Wednesday, 20 April 2005

From Pasadena Star News

If the nation’s largest telecommunications company gets its way, cable and satellite companies won’t be the only firms offering subscription video programming to local consumers.

New York-based Verizon Communications Inc. is making a national push to carry cable and local TV network programming using its fiber-optic networks, offering the first substantial non- satellite competition to conventional cable providers.

As part of its efforts, Verizon has enlisted the help of California Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, D-South Gate, to make it easier for phone companies to provide television ser vice in communities throughout the state.

De La Torre’s Assembly Bill 903 would allow phone companies to offer video programming in their existing service areas without having to provide access to an entire city or county.

“I think we’re just at the right time to catch the train before it really gets a head of steam going,’ De La Torre said. “I want to create a marketplace that is an equal playing field.’

Currently, state law allows competing cable and phone companies to enter a city already served by another company, but only if the new firm makes its video service a vailable to the entire municipality. Telephone companies argue that current law precludes small cable companies and other telecommunications providers from entering new markets, because their networks do not necessarily cover an entire community.

“One can interpret current law as requiring the phone company to have to exactly match existing boundaries (of cable companies),’ said Tim McCallion, Verizon’s Pacific regional president. “The cable companies have been aggressively entering telephone companies’ territory. We want to have the same opportunity to compete against cable companies.’

Increased competition could threaten cable providers’ monopolies in their existing territories, creating price wars as competitors battle for the same group of customers.

Cable companies have opposed the legislation, now in its earliest stage, saying it would allow some residents of a city or county served by two phone companies to receive video service, while others could go without.

“At the end of the day, what Verizon’s bill attempts to do is suggest they not be held to the same standard that we are,’ said Craig Watson, vice president of communication for Charter Communications Inc., which provides cable service in several San Gabriel Valley communities.

“The question is, do we, as a matter of public policy, end up with a patchwork system that somehow leaves some customers less served or unserved?’ Watson said.

Anthony Thomas, a lobbyist in Sacramento for the League of California Cities, said cities are most interested in providing competitive choices to their constituents and generating increased revenues through franchise taxes.

“They should, in fact, engage into a franchise and be required to pay for it,’ Thomas said. “In Los Angeles, there are more than 14 competing (cable) franchises. Does it provide competition, and does competition provide lower cost to the customer? And I would say, ‘Yes.’ ‘

This article is from Pasadena Star News. If you found it informative and valuable, we strongly encourage you to visit their website and register an account to view all their articles on the web. Support quality journalism.
 

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
< Prev   Next >
Top of Page P0wer ed by Mam b0 0pen S ource
Copyright @1996-2006 Public Access of Indianapolis